Self-Managed Teams are fully autonomous teams with little-to-no top-down supervision. They take full responsibility for their results, and they can be temporary or part of the overarching organization.
Tech companies like Google, Facebook, Spotify, and others use them to increase productivity and output at scale, with low overhead, while reducing pressure on managers who may already be stretched thin.
Examples of Self-Managed teams include:
According to most sources, about 80% of Fortune 500 companies are using self-managed teams in some form (although we had a hard time tracking down the original source for this stat). These teams perform well because they:
Autonomy is the driving force behind any self-managed team. What an organization must do is define the objectives, parameters, and vision, then get out of the way.
This isn’t easy. There’s a lot of trust involved in allowing a self-managed team to operate.
We’ll dive into the characteristics team members should have in the talent section, but it’s important that each team member is highly aware of the larger company goals, and the vision behind those goals.
Most of the businesses we talk to say that they want to give direction to their team members, and walk away knowing fully that the team knows how to execute, and why.
How To Align Self-Managed Team With The Company Vision
Here is a collection of the most effective vision strategies to use when aligning a self-managed team:
Tony Hseih founded LinkExchange at 23, sold it to Microsoft for $265 million two years later, and became the CEO of Zappos in 2000 when their total sales were $1.6 million.
In 2015, he offered severance packages to all employees who felt the idea of self-management wasn’t a fit.
Most decided to stay, but 18% took the package.
Four years later Zappos reached $1B in revenue.
It’s easy to see why self-managed teams are being used by 80% of Fortune 500 companies because they:
The 1990s saw a huge leap in the use of self-managed teams and their ability to to provide a competitive advantage:
The organizations above achieved this by:
In short: empower your talent to push themselves.
How To Align The Talent Of Self-Managed Teams
Self-management isn’t for everyone. Some people work more effectively with more rigid structure, and find leadership’s direction and feedback makes them more productive. People who do well on self-managed teams usually:
Effective Talent Strategies For Self-Managed Teams
Once the decision has been made to assemble a team to produce an outcome, the organization can align their talent by prioritizing those with the above characteristics (and any others that may be important). Then, they can use the following strategies as guidance:
The actual structure of a self-managed team can vary, as there’s usually no traditional hierarchy. Everyone understands how their role fits into the larger goal of the group. For example, a company may assemble self-managed teams for product design that would look like this:
Obviously the big selling point of a self-managed team is no managerial oversight, but that doesn’t always mean the team doesn’t have a lead. The difference, though, is that self-managed teams have a facilitator, who works within the guardrails set by leadership. They’re often referred to as a Servant Leader:
Self-directed Agile teams have the same idea, assigning a Scrum Master whose central role is to facilitate communication and backstage project management:
Other self-managed teams structures, like those used at Zappos and other large companies, the leadership responsibilities are distributed amongst different members of the team; authority belongs to the role, not to the individual.
Google is known for their commitment to cross-functional and self-managed teams, but they haven’t completely done away with management, and instead optimized the role of management to get more done (an engineering lead can facilitate several self-managed teams at one time, exponentially increasing the operational value of the manager).
How To Structure A Self-Managed Team
The self-managed team’s structural approach will depend on the size of the company and the goal of the team. Here’s a list of effective strategies when it comes to strengthening the organizational structure, decision making process, and communication of a self-managed team.
Self-Managed Team Organizational Structure
Self-Managed Team Decision Making Process
Self-Managed Team Communication
We hold the vision, not the circumstance.
We communicate with compassion and respect for others.
We do what we say & live on the solution side of situations.
We take aligned action and produce results.
We create 5-star moments and leave people better than we found them.
We generate fun and joy on the journey and find something to be grateful for in everything.